6 Senators ask for Trinity Guardrail Investigation

This latest development where six senators have asked for an investigation on the Federal Highway's Administrations monitoring of possibly defective Trinity Guardrails. Sen. Richard Blumenthal signed a request asking questions about the adequacy of the Administrations oversight of Trinity Guardrails. Reports indicate that at least 8 lawsuits have been filed from the estate of families whose loved ones died as result of a Trinity Guardrail accident. The Federal Highway's Administrations did not have a comment on the investigation into Trinity Guardrail at this time. There still has not been a final determination on the 8th and final Trinity Guardrail crash test which some are claiming failed. This request by the six senators includes a request to investigate how the agency deals with a conflict of interest between people who sell these guardrails vs the people who conduct the tests. There are others who have questions both the methods of the crash test as well as the actual design of the Trinity guardrails that are being tested. Trinity was previously found guilty of fraud and had to pay over $500 million dollars as a result of a whistle blower lawsuit. 42 states has halted the installation of new Trinity Guardrails and some states including Virginia has already started to remove the possibly deadly guardrails.

Full Text of the Letter these senators sent regarding an investigation into Trinity Guardrails.

Dear Mr. Dodaro:

The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) disburses about $40 billion annually to states for projects to build, improve and maintain the nation's highways and bridges. These projects incorporate important safety features, including roadside safety hardware devices like reflectors, steel guardrails, sign posts, concrete barrier walls, and breakaway highway lighting poles, among other equipment critical to the safety of the traveling public. In recent months, we have witnessed a host of troubling developments that call into question the safety of certain roadside devices known as highway guardrail end terminals. In October 2014, a federal jury in Texas returned a $525 million verdict against a manufacturer of these devices who was alleged to have altered their specifications without notifying federal authorities. Since then, dozens of states have suspended installation of these devices on their roads. Some experts have voiced concerns about the devices as well.

We are committed to looking closely at this issue. As a group of senators that includes both the ranking member of the Senate Commerce Committee's Subcommittee on Consumer Protection, Product Safety, Insurance, and Data Security as well as the ranking member of the Subcommittee on Surface Transportation and Merchant Marine Infrastructure, Safety and Security, we feel a particular responsibility to ensure that a strong and effective oversight regimen exists. The developments over the past several months raise serious questions about the effectiveness of the current framework for evaluating the reliability and integrity of roadside hardware products, including guardrail end terminals. Under the current oversight regimen, several parties are involved in setting safety standards and evaluating whether roadside hardware devices meet appropriate criteria. These entities include FHWA, the Transportation Research Board, the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, research facilities, and device manufacturers. FHWA, as the guardian of federal taxpayer dollars, has a unique and vital role and responsibility in ensuring that roadside hardware has been properly vetted for safety purposes and is eligible for reimbursement with federal funds. We write requesting that GAO investigate the current framework, specifically addressing the following topics:

1. The role that FHWA is obligated to play in ensuring the safety and sufficiency of roadside hardware.

2. The role the agency actually plays in ensuring the safety and sufficiency of roadside hardware and whether and how this differs at all from the role the agency is required to play.

3. The regulatory process for developing standards for roadside safety hardware.

4. The respective roles that FHWA, other federal agencies, states, trade associations, research facilities, device manufacturers, and any other parties play in the development of safety standards.

5. The testing process for roadside safety hardware, including the thoroughness and transparency of the process.

6. The mechanisms in place to mitigate any actual or apparent conflicts of interest between entities with a commercial interest in roadside safety hardware and entities (a) developing standards and (b) testing roadside safety hardware.

7. The adequacy of government-maintained and publicly available information about the quantity and location of particular types of roadside safety hardware devices installed on public roads, as well as the performance of those devices.

8. Any additional actions that FHWA or Congress can take to ensure the safety and sufficiency of roadside safety hardware.

There may be many other issues you encounter in your study besides those we have laid forth above, and we urge you to pursue those as appropriate. Your efforts will help as we work to ensure that taxpayers can rest assured that federal dollars are only spent on safe, trustworthy and reliable products.


United States Senate

United States Senate

United States Senate

United States Senate

United States Senate

United States Senate

Trinity Guardrail Lawyers

Brent Coon and Associates has extensive experience auto accident lawsuits including the General Motors Recall Litigation and will now include the Defective Guardrail litigation. Each Defective Guardrail lawsuit is different and our Trinity Guardrail lawyers will guide you through the steps of a Guardrail Lawsuit required to ensure you maximum recovery. Complete the form to the right to have our Defective Recall Lawyers review your claim for free. Brent Coon and Associates law offices all over the country. You can contact our Trinity Guardrail Lawyers at 855-435-5839 for information on filing a Trinity Guardrail lawsuit.

Complete the Defective Guardrail Free Lawsuit Evaluation to Have Your Case Reviewed by Brent Coon and Associates.

Or contact us via our Defective Guardrail Lawsuit Hotline at:


* Indicates the Information is Required

* First Name:
* Last Name:
* Phone number:
* E-mail address:
* State:
ZIP Code:
Was there an accident
* Tell Us What Happened: